Editorial policy
LaunchLint publishes topics that can be tied to primary sources, practical release work, and explicit boundaries of static analysis.
Apple, Google, Expo, Flutter, Capacitor, and official platform documentation take priority. Secondary sources may explain context but do not replace the controlling source.
We avoid unsupported rejection rates, approval promises, and false precision. Time-sensitive requirements carry a review date and direct source.
Articles are checked for intent, technical accuracy, store relevance, product limits, and readability. Examples distinguish project configuration, store-console settings, and runtime behavior.
Generated volume is not a quality signal. Repeated blocks are reduced; every section must add a decision, example, or verifiable explanation.
Reports are checked against the linked source and a reproducible project context. Material requirement or technical changes receive a new review date and `lastmod`.
A known error is replaced clearly rather than retained for traffic. Personal details from reports are never published.
LaunchLint is commercial. Academy content may lead to a tool or paid review but must provide a useful answer without purchase.
Nothing is legal advice or an approval guarantee. Store teams decide independently, and runtime or backend behavior may remain outside static analysis.
Report an error or outdated source: support@launchlint.app